News Feed

In a move that has been ridiculously hailed as a significant step towards reducing energy costs for public institutions, GB Energy has announced a £200 million investment in solar panels for schools and hospitals across the UK. However, this initiative raises questions about whether it is more of a public relations exercise than a genuine solution to the country's energy security challenges. The NHS alone faces an annual energy bill of £1.4 billion, more than double what it was in 2019. Schools, too, have seen their energy costs soar. Against this backdrop, a £200 million investment in solar panels seems pointless and negligible, especially when considering the scale of the energy crisis.

Solar panels do not offer a comprehensive solution to energy security. The UK's energy needs are complex and multifaceted, requiring a more robust and diversified approach than just a handful of renewable energy installations in the form of solar panels. The intermittent nature of solar power means that it cannot replace traditional energy sources from fossils without significant advancements in storage technology. Even then renewables always need fossil fuel back-up.

True energy security can only be achieved by embracing a diverse mix of reliable energy sources - with fossil fuels as the epicentre.

This absolutely includes maximising the potential of North Sea oil and gas reserves, as well as exploring domestic shale gas through fracking.

These resources offer the consistent and scalable energy production needed to power the UK's economy and meet its energy demands.

In contrast, a handful of solar panels on rooftops of the NHS and schools is a PR stunt that will not keep the lights on during winter nights or fuel the nation's industries.

The UK's energy landscape is undergoing significant changes. The government has increased windfall taxes on North Sea oil and gas producers, leading to a decline in domestic production and an increase in energy imports.

This shift towards renewable energy is driven by the madness of net-zero targets established by the "Uni-party" under former Conservative PM Theresa May, but it also highlights the challenges of transitioning away from fossil fuels without compromising energy security.

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has begun to dial back on the UK's net-zero ambitions, questioning the feasibility and economic viability of achieving net-zero by 2050.

This shift in perspective reflects growing concerns about balancing environmental goals with economic realities. As Badenoch's stance suggests, there is a need for a more nuanced approach to climate policy, one that considers the practical implications of transitioning to a low-carbon economy.

Despite the 'managed decline' in North Sea oil and gas production, these resources remain crucial for UK energy security. However, the majority of UK oil is exported, and domestic gas production is insufficient to meet demand, making the UK a net importer of both.

The North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) plays a key role in maximising the value from the UK Continental Shelf, but even with new licensing rounds, the impact on energy security is limited due to the export-oriented nature of North Sea production.

Fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, offers a potential solution to enhance domestic energy production.

The UK's energy infrastructure faces significant challenges, particularly in integrating renewable energy sources into the grid. The National Energy System Operator (NESO) is tasked with planning and operating the electricity system, but grid capacity issues hinder the full potential of renewable projects. Urgent investment in infrastructure is needed to support the growth of renewable energy and ensure a stable energy supply.

GB Energy's solar panel investment, idealogically driven, will not make a dent in the energy costs faced by schools and hospitals. The sum is modest compared to the scale of the problem, and solar panels can most certainly not solve the UK's energy security issues.

This initiative appears more as a sustainable PR stunt, using the NHS and schools to promote a narrative of environmental responsibility without addressing the underlying serious and pressing energy challenges.

Lois Perry is the Director of Heartland UK & Europe and a former leader of UKIP


Source link

Leave A Comment


Last Visited Articles


Info Board

Visitor Counter
0
 

Todays visit

41 Articles 2385 RSS ARTS 106 Photos

Popular News

🚀 Welcome to our website! Stay updated with the latest news. 🎉

United States

3.145.43.59 :: Total visit:


Welcome 3.445.43.59 Click here to Register or login
Oslo time:2025-04-04 Whos is online (last 5 min): 
1 - United States - 3.550.553.65
2 - Singapore - 47.728.22.238
3 - United States - 3.222.248.266
4 - Singapore - 47.228.229.220
5 - Singapore - 57.528.63.569
6 - United States - 57.707.47.777
7 - United States - 400.25.420.246
8 - United States - 08.205.90.000
9 - Singapore - 47.424.47.64
10 - Singapore - 47.828.23.884
11 - Singapore - 47.428.34.208
12 - United States - 34.243.63.32
13 - Singapore - 47.428.44.53
14 - United States - 7.74.64.702
15 - United States - 48.224.240.445
16 - Singapore - 47.628.57.684
17 - Singapore - 47.778.770.46
18 - Singapore - 77.728.77.57
19 - United States - 3.445.400.463
20 - Singapore - 47.728.78.274
21 - Singapore - 47.828.37.24
22 - United States - 3.747.43.79


Farsi English Norsk RSS